Friday, November 10, 2006

NYTimes.com | Cosmopolitan Moms (Happy Hour Play Dates)

By Stacy Lu

'[...] Happy-hour play dates are here. Between runs to soccer and ballet classes, fund-raisers and homework projects, some stay-at-home mothers are sipping cocktails at afternoon spa parties, drinking bloody marys at play groups and toting wine and wine coolers to parks and friends’ decks while their children frolic nearby.
These women are not out to get drunk, they say. And they insist they are not drinking out of need. Rather, they are looking for a small break from the conventions of mommy-hood — a way to hold on to a part of their lives that existed before they had children and to bond over a shared disdain for the almost sadistically stressful world of modern parenting.
They know they will be criticized. They live, after all, in an age when many parents are so protective, they hire consultants to childproof their homes. Most acknowledge there can be a fine line between social and problem drinking and that the mix of children and alcohol is a dangerous one. And women who are pregnant keep away from the bar.
But some women are almost defiant in their defense of the afternoon group “momtini,” as one blogger calls it, and they speak out on the Web, in books and in interviews. The mothers do not know how many like-minded women are out there — there is no real way to quantify it — but they sense a change.[...]


Suniya S. Luthar, a psychology professor at Columbia University and mother of two, said her research has shown that alcohol and drug use is up among relatively affluent mothers. And there seems to be a reason.
“We are in a position right now where women can feel incredibly disconnected and lonely,” Dr. Luthar said, explaining that the apparent self-medicating she has found in interviews with clinicians and private practitioners and in an online survey could be a dangerous trend. [...]

Dr. Luthar, the psychologist, conceded that drinking together does beat drinking alone, particularly if the women in their groups can “achieve that sense of connectedness, with feelings of being seen, being heard, and of being understood.” Others, though, see alcohol as a risky way to connect. While many of the mothers who defended cocktail play dates claimed that having children underfoot promoted greater restraint, most probably would not tolerate it from hired caregivers. [...]'
Published: November 9, 2006

Tuesday, November 07, 2006

Timesonline.co.uk | Lure of television is stronger than a smile

by David Lister, Scotland Correspondent
'[...] In a study that raises disturbing questions about the ability of a generation of children to interact with others, psychologists discovered that children aged 6 to 8 respond to the image of a television as alcoholics do to pictures of drink.
In a series of experiments conducted in primary schools, most looked at a picture of a blank television screen as soon as it flashed up on a computer next to a smiling face.
Markus Bindemann, a researcher in psychology at the University of Glasgow and co-author of Television at Face Value: Children’s Behaviour in Attention-Cueing Tasks, described the results as worrying. [...]

According to recent research, the average British child aged 4 to 6 watches about 16 hours of television a week. By their teens, four out of five have a television in their bedroom. Kevin Browne, Professor of Forensic and Family Psychology at the University of Birmingham, said that the study raised questions about whether parents were using television and computers as a cheap way of entertaining their children: “How a child has been socialised in the first few years of life will seriously affect whether he or she engages with people or engages with a television screen.” He cautioned that there may be other reasons why children favour the television screen, including an “anticipation” about what they think they might see on it.'

The Times November 07, 2006

Sunday, November 05, 2006

Timesonline.co.uk | 'Baby shrinks' put troubled tots on couch

by Tony Allen-Mills and Claire Newell
'BABIES as young as two months are being balanced on the psychiatrist’s couch as anxious parents seek early answers to relationship “issues” with their new-born children.
The infants are being subjected to as many as six weekly sessions in clinics to tackle problems which include constant crying or difficulty in sleeping.
NI_MPU('middle');
The idea that babies might benefit from analysis sessions with psychiatrists is gaining ground among both doctors and parents who believe that a variety of childhood problems could be averted by early diagnosis and treatment.[...]'

The Sunday Times, October 29, 2006